Naked Snake Posted January 4, 2002 Well, I belive in this law, for the following reasons. 1)Protection against an intruder Pro:protection Con:you could injure a family member 2)Hunting Pro:helps decrees the population of hunted animals Con:gun could be found by a kid or something Now onto whats wrong with this law. We have the right to bear arms in America, but arms like these? If you think those are fake...these are real products that are sold. 0 Share this post Link to post
Rancid-Radio Posted January 4, 2002 arms like these? GwahAHaHAHAHahAHaHAAh!!! yeah, we have the right to have guns. if your to stupid to keep them hidden and out of reach of kids then your just stupid and you give humans a bad name and i dont think that this is really an extreme weapon. you can make something equally dangerous with a bunch of tin cans and lighter fluid. 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted January 4, 2002 WE ALREADY HAD A THREAD ABOUT ARMS **TIMELINE PIC GOES HERE*** 2)Hunting Pro:helps decrees the population of hunted animalsRetard. 0 Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted January 4, 2002 2)Hunting Pro:helps decrees the population of hunted animals Retard. Yeah that doesn't really makes any sense. Or you're an animal hater, in wich case you deserve more pain. 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted January 4, 2002 Hey, you quoted me as part of BBG's quote :) 0 Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted January 4, 2002 Hey, you quoted me as part of BBG's quote :) Actually that was my point... 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted January 4, 2002 Hmm? You are not comparing me to BBG or anything? :) 0 Share this post Link to post
deadnail Posted January 4, 2002 Actually one of the main points of the 2nd Big One is that we not only can but should keep ourselves armed, in case any government (even our own) tries to fuck with us. 0 Share this post Link to post
IMJack Posted January 4, 2002 Actually one of the main points of the 2nd Big One is that we not only can but should keep ourselves armed, in case any government (even our own) tries to fuck with us.True enough. But if the government gets pushy, do you really need an assault weapon? Would it do any good? Civilians with small arms and hunting weapons is fine by me. Civilians with weapons that rival some of the things our boys in Afghanistan are using... no. We recently lost a respected police chief to some wife-beating nutter with an AK-47. (The chief called attention to himself in order to save his troopers.) 0 Share this post Link to post
sleepy_boy Posted January 4, 2002 guns...hmmm... I live in Canada, and here, we have stupid fucking regestration & licence laws. ...but what about that potato cannon i'm building in my spare time...hmmmm... 0 Share this post Link to post
ShadyXMR Posted January 4, 2002 Hunting for sport is idiotic. If you eventually eat your kill then it is fine.We recently lost a respected police chief to some wife-beating nutter with an AK-47. Tell me, would this police chief not have died if the wife-beating nutter had used something less than an AK-47, like say a Mini-14? 0 Share this post Link to post
IMJack Posted January 4, 2002 Hard to say. Does a Mini-14 have full-auto capabilities? The chief was dead almost immediately after the burst hit him. 0 Share this post Link to post
ShadyXMR Posted January 4, 2002 Hard to say. Does a Mini-14 have full-auto capabilities? The chief was dead almost immediately after the burst hit him. Mini-14s fire rounds as fast as you can twitch your finger. However, that is irrelevent. One shot, even from a .22, is enough to kill a man on the spot. 0 Share this post Link to post
IMJack Posted January 4, 2002 Mini-14s fire rounds as fast as you can twitch your finger. However, that is irrelevent. One shot, even from a .22, is enough to kill a man on the spot.... if the gunman is lucky, or if it's aimed right. I know someone who ate four rounds from a light machine gun, and he's still very much alive thirty years later. I believe the chief and his troopers were wearing armor. However, police-issue Kevlar won't help against anything more powerful than a light pistol round. Also, it is hard to be focused enough to fire several accurate semi-auto rounds when you're halfway tanked, as this fine gentleman was. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted January 4, 2002 Mini-14s fire rounds as fast as you can twitch your finger. However, that is irrelevent. One shot, even from a .22, is enough to kill a man on the spot.But you have to have good enough aim. Somebody with an automatic can just fire a spray in a general direction until something gets hit. 0 Share this post Link to post
Liam Posted January 4, 2002 We might or might not be better off without guns but as things stand we have the right to bear them and we've taken advantage of that right. Taking it away all of a sudden would just make every responsible gun owner into a criminal. 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 4, 2002 Mini-14s fire rounds as fast as you can twitch your finger. However, that is irrelevent. One shot, even from a .22, is enough to kill a man on the spot.... if the gunman is lucky, or if it's aimed right. I know someone who ate four rounds from a light machine gun, and he's still very much alive thirty years later. Must be a low-calibre light machinegun like the belgian SAW M249 "Minimi". If it's a calibre 7.62 it's likely to rip your belly apart. Four rounds of calibre 7.62 on different spots on your body is likely to cut you in half, which'll either chain you to the weelchair or kill you. 0 Share this post Link to post
danarchist Posted January 4, 2002 arms WTF? Self-defence for yuppies?like Thats gotta hurt like a bitch. I bet its a lot safer than those fucking sparkler bombs the neighbour kids keep making. Damn, I hat those things.these? Yeah...now why the hell do civilians get to even touch crap like this?If you think those are fake...these are real products that are sold. If I want self-defence, I'll buy it from Bud K, thank you very much! 0 Share this post Link to post
dr_st Posted January 4, 2002 Big Guns, eh? We'll see what you all gonna say when I buy (or build) that BFGoogol with the automatic sandwich maker. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted January 4, 2002 these? Yeah...now why the hell do civilians get to even touch crap like this?That looks like an incredibly poor attempt at Photoshopping to me. 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 4, 2002 If things worked right, no civies ever got their hands around a gun - and there would be no need to use guns to defend oneself. Sadly, society is created and regulated by humans, which means that it's automatically flawed. 0 Share this post Link to post
Lüt Posted January 4, 2002 Sadly, society is created and regulated by humans, which means that it's automatically flawed.SHADY, QUIT STEALING OTHER MEMBERS PASSWORDS! 0 Share this post Link to post
dsm Posted January 4, 2002 Sadly, society is created and regulated by humans, which means that it's automatically flawed.SHADY, QUIT STEALING OTHER MEMBERS PASSWORDS! Huh? Hey! I don't wish that humanity gets wiped out, I'm merely saying that it's human to err. 0 Share this post Link to post
læmænt Posted January 4, 2002 Wiping out the human race would be fun... Imagine all those millions of people, crying "Please don't kill me!!!!" And then KABOOM! and they are all gone. 0 Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted January 5, 2002 You sure sound like a freak, are you sure "Jazz" is the right term? ;) 0 Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted January 5, 2002 WE ALREADY HAD A THREAD ABOUT ARMS **TIMELINE PIC GOES HERE*** 2)Hunting Pro:helps decrees the population of hunted animalsRetard. Ok. Lemme break it down for you lament, since you seem to miss the point. Deer mate Deer population grows Overeating occurs Deer die in droves Deer almost die out in an area If a population is to high, there isnt enough food to go around, therefore the animals die in large numbers. The hunting seasons are regulated, you can only take a certain amount of animals. Its all a cycle. 0 Share this post Link to post
NiGHTMARE Posted January 5, 2002 2)Hunting Pro:helps decrees the population of hunted animals Con:gun could be found by a kid or something What about cruelty to animals? And by that I mean people blowing their legs off, shooting them in the stomach, etc, and just leaving them to die. 0 Share this post Link to post
Recommended Posts