Jump to content

Compet-N: incoming and discussion, part 2 [post Compet-N entries here]


Recommended Posts

Of course using Dosbox was never against the Compet-n rules, which specified the exe required but said nothing about the OS. As long as players adhere to the letter and spirit of the rules (which was sometimes clarified in the compet-n forums), there is no problem. If you use it as a way to get slow motion, then obviously you fall foul of the rule against that, but this is a separate matter.

Edited by Grazza

Share this post


Link to post
21 hours ago, fx02 said:

Dosbox...it's not valid but how can anyone detect if someone used modified dosbox to record demos?

Bullshit! Dosbox has been valid and is valid, but I don't recommend it as you give yourself a handicap... unless one modifies the DOSbox and makes it non-laggy etc. Even Hi Jango used an emulator for his CN demos, but under the original exe!

 

But let's face it: who would be so stupid to modify dosbox to fake compet-n demos? Modifying LMP file is no rocket science, but modifying dosbox is a lot more rocket science. It's much more easy to fake a demo on sourceport and then say it is a vanilla under dosbox demo.

 

Edit: I guess you meant the "new compet-N"... my bad because I am not sure how the old and the new compet~n / compet-N differs. Maybe the way as I just wrote it?

Edited by Looper

Share this post


Link to post

Hehe, of course DOSbox is ""valid"" as long as you use it without hacks and original .exe. I mean, finding modified dosbox is just few clicks away on any search engine, no rocket science needed today :)

 

@Fabian, yeah I will probably use high resolution as before...

Edited by fx02

Share this post


Link to post
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Rusty demo, but time is good :)

This is probably one of the maps with the lowest exit/numbers of runs ratio ever for me.

n4m1-027.zip

Edited by Guiddqd

Share this post


Link to post
  • 3 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

av map05 in 0:53, one second faster than Adam Williamson. I had originally intended it for a forum competition where you beat selected records, but didn't get around to beating it until now.

 

av05-053.zip

Share this post


Link to post
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...