boris Posted August 10, 2004 Deathmatcher said:Think about Barrels o´fun. The idea with the many barrels was new at that time and the wide open areas where impressive at that time. But this level would never be called a superior level if it was released today as a pwad. None of the Doom levels would be called that today. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
aL BeasTie Posted August 10, 2004 DOOM 1.7a - before ultimate. ep2 - where it all starts to happen e2m4 - not a hard one, but I still really enjoy this level. I personally rarely even like the map designs in current games, infact I have trouble playing some fps's, mainly ones on consoles, my DOOM instincts are so imbedded that I expect to find more items and enemies etc. and also expect to see things like landmarks and points of reference. Games like Serious Sam are like one big stone texture to me, I don't want to move from where I am incase it's going to take too long :) DOOM really did have an enormous amount of time spent on making the levels (I think the doom2 stages averaged 40hrs completion, someone correct me on this thou) I personally still think the original DOOM games have the best level design ever, but to todays standards they couldn't be looked at like that, considering that levels in games today arn't limited to a maximum heightdef etc. it's been a while since I loaded up DCK or similar, what's the max height of a ceiling in DOOM? well anyhow that basically makes the levels to our eyes today that are used to more "true to life" gfx precieve them as being squarish or blocky (as in everything based off squares rather than curves etc. blah blah 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Cloud Strife Posted August 12, 2004 1-Ultimate doom(has some of my favorite level designs, better than D2, i liked Spider MM. boss beter than head boss in D2, mostly evrything better than D2) 2-Doom 64(great atmospheric fx, good weapon designs, really good levels) 3-Doom 2(1 better weapon super sgun) 4-doom 32(didnt really like it too much) 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Stealthy Ivan Posted August 13, 2004 Ultimate Doom. The levels are more realistic looking and it's levels go along with the story more than Doom 2's levels do. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Erik Posted August 13, 2004 boris said:None of the Doom levels would be called that today. I'd say that e4m6 would recieve very good critique even by today's standards. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
DooMBoy Posted August 13, 2004 So would E1M1, the only downside I can think of for that particular map is that it has next to no detail...and yet it still looks good, 11 years after it was made. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
DooMBoy Posted August 13, 2004 Not really, no. It's way too small for one thing, and for another it was probably done in 10 minutes. Oh and what's up with having to find a section of wall that's really a door to exit the level? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
188DarkRevived Posted August 15, 2004 I didn't like E2M9 either. But I loved E3M9. That one was the sweetest map in E3, next to House of Pain, IMO. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Intel17 Posted January 30, 2008 So, which of the two games do you guys prefer? The Ultimate Doom (or original 3-episode Doom if that's what you're running) or Doom II? I find that the Ultimate Doom is a lot more replayable and has more interesting level design, and it's just a lot more fun to play. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
ryaxnb Posted January 30, 2008 I prefer the Ultimate Doom. But only Episodes 1 to 3. 4 is just too hard. I'd take Doom II's Map29, Map 07, Map04, etc, over Episode 4 anyday. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Reckoner Posted January 30, 2008 I think the original Doom and Ultimate Doom had better maps than Doom II, but Doom II had a better monster selection for use in custom maps. Yes, a lot of people can be annoyed by Doom II's monsters when they're not used properly, but the availability of mid-level enemies like the Hell-Knights and Chaingunners, along with the introduction of some more tougher enemies (again, when used appropriately), offers some better game-play opportunities. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted January 30, 2008 Doom 1 because it actually had a go at having some ambiance. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Reckoner Posted January 30, 2008 Captain Red said:Doom 1 because it actually had a go at having some ambiance. That's one of the reasons why I really liked Doom 64, but I think the first Doom's gameplay is what really puts it ahead of Doom II; the ambience and atmosphere is just a bonus. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Jim Rainer Posted January 30, 2008 Doom 1/Ultimate Doom - E1 is probably the best installment of doom. Doom 2 - Way more mods made for it. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
myk Posted January 30, 2008 I don't really take them as separate games, so I just like them both as parts of the same thing. DOOM II is basically episodes 4-6 of DOOM. There are more thing types in the last 3 episodes, but then again, there are similarly more thing types in episodes 2-3 than in the 1st. That increase in juiciness makes progress through the game more interesting in general. I tend to judge level design more by author rather than by episode or game. Thus overall DOOM and DOOM II have about equal quality, with DOOM II having a more refined challenge on its side, as Romero and Petersen did get a bit more demanding as they got more experienced. For DeathMatch, DOOM II is definitely more intense, but again, I don't mind some matches in DOOM levels once in a while. It's true that the first episode has the most concentrated mood or ambience, but part of that charm in my case also has to do with it being the first part I played (and the 1st FPS game as I wasn't familiar with Wolfenstein 3D yet). But after that, the individual levels may vary in that respect, but either game has its share of more (or less) moody levels. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
ZehCacodemon Posted January 30, 2008 Ultimate/Doom please. I really got into Ultimate Doom's four episodes. It was awesome.. Doom 2 I'm struggling to get into. The maps are so confusing. <D>' 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Coopersville Posted January 30, 2008 With the games by themselves, The Ultimate Doom, though I usually only play Episode 1. Otherwise, Doom 2, since it has the larger and better collection of wads. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
printz Posted January 30, 2008 For the challenges -- Doom 2. For the episode progression -- Doom 1. Doom 2 has many cool monsters, like Archvile or Revenant, that Doom 1 hasn't. You'll hardly know the tensions of guided missiles and GETTING-OUT-OF-SIGHT if you don't play Doom 2 enough. Doom 1 can have better megawads than Doom 2 -- there are more levels, twice more secret levels, arranged regularly, and better endings -- no Spitters, but 1-shot-kill Cyberdemons or health-dropping Spiderdemons. Also there's more Dehacked potential if vanilla Doom is used -- there are the free missile and monster frames from Doom 2. I find Doom 1 and Doom 2 to be different games. Doom 1 is more traditional, similar to Wolfenstein 3d in weapons and monsters, whereas Doom 2 gives more firepower (super shotgun) against more aggressive and healthier enemies. Doom 1 has "episode 4: thy flesh consumed" as expansion, while Doom 2 has "the master levels" and "final Doom". 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
RTC_Marine Posted January 30, 2008 Doom 1 is my favorite, never really liked Doom 2 at all. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
icecreamsoldier Posted January 30, 2008 I agree with printz. Whenever I play Ultimate Doom I find myself wishing for the SSG. Killing demons, hell knights, barons of hell and cacodemons is a real pain without it. Aside from that though I rank them pretty equally. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Mithral_Demon Posted January 31, 2008 Hmmmmmn.... icecreamsoldier said:hell knights Thats a Doom 2 monster. Other then that, I'd play Doom 2 over Doom 1 unless Doom 1 gets more KDIZD based stuff... Wonder when SoZD will be unleashed. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
_bruce_ Posted January 31, 2008 Though I think highly of Doom1... Doom 2 - for me the coolest game ever. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
BJ Blazkowicz Posted January 31, 2008 Mithral_Demon said:Thats a Doom 2 monster. He probably meant Baron of Hell. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Mithral_Demon Posted January 31, 2008 BJ Blazkowicz said:He probably meant Baron of Hell. He already said that in his post, see? >_>icecreamsoldier said:I agree with printz. Whenever I play Ultimate Doom I find myself wishing for the SSG. Killing demons, hell knights, barons of hell and cacodemons is a real pain without it. Aside from that though I rank them pretty equally. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
icecreamsoldier Posted January 31, 2008 Sorry, I do tend to get the two games confused... but you understand my point anyway which is the main thing. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Impie Posted January 31, 2008 I pick Doom 1 because I like the level design better. I don't miss the super shotgun because it's overkill without revenants and mancubi to use it on. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
40oz Posted January 31, 2008 I think it's pretty agreeable that Doom 1 had the best maps, and Doom 2 had better monsters and a better weapon, and shitty maps to play them in. Undoubtedly Episode 1 is the best Doom mapset in the world. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.