Livo Posted August 22, 2002 http://gamespot.com/gamespot/filters/products/media/0,11100,469881,00.html Nothing really new given out, but still interesting. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted August 22, 2002 Heh, cool. To bad I cannot download it, only stream it. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Disorder Posted August 22, 2002 Cool. Nothing really new, but it's always nice to see Mr. Hollenshead speak.. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Naked Snake Posted August 22, 2002 I think you mean Todd, not Tom :) 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted August 22, 2002 Todd Hollenshead said: John [Carmack] has capped the fps to 60. Interesting. Wonder why he moved it down from the 90fps that was standard in Quake 3. I'm sure it's just a cvar though, and if you want to run Doom III at a higher fps for some godawful reason, you could change that. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
EVIL Posted August 22, 2002 90 fps isnt nessecary for a mainly focust singleplayer game.. I think the fps will be set higher by a pointrelease, once faster 3d cards get on to the market that could give a 90 fps on doom. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted August 23, 2002 Hmm I wouldn't want to start the whole fps debate over again, but it's clear to everyone that a constant steady 60fps is better than a framerate that fluctuates between 90 and 30 all the time. And as Carmack says, there's no real value past 60 frames per second. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Wobbo Posted August 31, 2002 whats the point of capping a framerate? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted August 31, 2002 When there's no value above 60fps, why put your video card and CPU trough all the extra work to get to 90fps ? Also this prevents a jumpy high framerate on high-end systems - a steady 60fps is easier on the eyes than something that jumps from 60 to 90 to 70 fps all the time. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Zaldron Posted August 31, 2002 You don't need 120 fps when there's plenty of physics calculations to be performed. The game will rather spend that extra CPU processing power for other relevant aspects of the game (sound, AI, etc). 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
SyntherAugustus Posted August 31, 2002 After seeing the first doom III movie i noticed something... Carmacks a nerd! Heh. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Disorder Posted September 1, 2002 RailGunner said:After seeing the first doom III movie i noticed something... Carmacks a nerd! Heh. Blasphemy!! 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Livo Posted September 1, 2002 RailGunner said:After seeing the first doom III movie i noticed something... Carmacks a nerd! Heh. Your brillant powers of observation are indeed unsurpassed...too bad the rest of the world noticed that around 1992-3. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
SyntherAugustus Posted September 1, 2002 Livo said:Your brillant powers of observation are indeed unsurpassed...too bad the rest of the world noticed that around 1992-3. I was a little tiny boy back then. Im 13 now. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Use Posted September 1, 2002 RailGunner said:After seeing the first doom III movie i noticed something... Carmacks a nerd! Heh. watch it, that's my idol you're talking about 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Lord FlatHead Posted September 1, 2002 He's not a nerd, he's a terrifyingly smart millionaire geek. And he drives nice cars. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Disorder Posted September 1, 2002 But does he have a nice hot chick as John Romero? NNooOOoo!!1 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
LorD BaZTArD Posted September 1, 2002 I dunno.....He's Married to Anna Kang isn't he? SO disorder is wrong :P 0 Quote Share this post Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.